Thuesday the 7 october, I met Howard Lewis Ship, the father of Tapestry 5 Java web framework in Paris.
He was here for a 3 weeks trip in Europe, far from its home, Portland, USA.
There were Howard, his wife Suzan, and almost all my developers team, so 5 people from Linagora, all of them T5 addicts.
Evening part I : bar and T5
Imminent release of 5.0 final....
The evening began with a beer (or two...) in a bar near Linagora, and the discussion almost immediately started on Tapestry 5. Howard wanted to know how we came to T5, so I explained that I'm following its development since 5.0.1 and that I didn't chose at all by luck T5. Now, every developer in my team use T5, and quite like it.
We chatted about the iminent release of T5.0 final (YES !), the beauty of the framework thanks to the IoC framework, its scalabity, not only in performance, but in all thinkable meaning of the term : scalabitly in component from technical ones to business ones, scalabilty of the T5 user target from the business oriented people to the the technical nerd, etc.
We also discussed the missing points, around the documentation and some little things (what bring me to a ml post on the subject).
... and Tapestry 5.1 project...
The discussion followed on the 5.1 release, it's short, time-based and not functionnality-based release cycle, every 3 to max 5 month.
I think this is a really good new, because it was one of the most recurrent criticism against Tapestry : its really really long release cycle, along with the compatibility issue between them. Even if Howard came back several times on the last point (it's even explained in the T5 home page, at the bottom), upgrades would be even smoother if there is less time between them. Moreover, from a customer point of view, it's always best to have his product based on a stable release. I mean, a release tagged stable, because T5 is already one of the most stable soft I used, but the "alpha" or "beta" status is something quite frightening for a customer...
Afterwards, Howard gives us the possibility to argue for our "most wanted feature".
This is our wish-list, along with what Howard expects :
Plus, this is a really good feature to ship, especially directed to the IT managers. It's the kind of tool that make them think they can actually develop using boxes and arrows. I'm not completely sure I want Spring web flow integration into T5, but I definitely want a conversation persistence scope, along with a clean way to manage "wizards". So, if it has to come with Spring Web Flow integration, so be it...
- skinning / themes
That was the main points, but we also talked about other framework as Terracotta, and ideas as ""CRUD should be free" (I would just add "as long as it is a side module, and not in the core". That's not really a problem with T5 and it's pluggable architecture, but for example, all the CRUD stuff is of no use in InterLDAP).
...in an evolving Java ecosystem
The last discussions in the bar where less focused on Tapestry, and more on the Java ecosystem. Java 7 came in the discussion, and I was happy to discover that Howard seems to share most of my view on the subject. He agree that the JVM need optimizations (faster, more plugable, more versatile, etc), but that Java the language should not evolve anymore...
We talked about Scala and Groovy, his preference going to the second one (obviously, mine is in the first :), but he really likes the lazy evaluation possibilities that Scala bring.
Here, there is something that I don't understand... For a functional developer, all Tapestry architecture is built around functional concept, I see map/fold and pattern matching every where in Tapestry :)
Jean-Louis, one of my co-worker, talked about his "easy ant" project - take the best of Ant and Maven dependency management thanks to Ivy. A to-be-followed project.
Evening part II : "La Casita" restaurant
For the end of the evening, we moved to "La Casita", a french restaurant near Les Champs Elysées. It's a typical France South-West cooking restaurant, with Champagne, Foie Gras, snails, duck, wine, cheese... And to my great pleasure, Suzan and Howard seemed to enjoy it !
So much for our French a priori and cliché about American taste :)
There, we talked less about Tapestry, and more on general subjects. We chatted about the difference on open source in USA (more pragmatic, due to cost efficiency) and in France (more philosophical and political).
We also had an input around the use of IRC, and the complementarity this communication channel can have with the traditionnal mailing list (folks, come in the Tapestry irc chan : #tapestry on freenode).
See you next time !
Along the night, I tested the Ballmer Peak applied to English spoken skills, and went at least as far in the curve as Millenium developpers...
For me, it was a really really great evening, Howard and Suzan are really nice people.
Moreover, Howard is one of the best architect I know in the Java world, it was a great pleasure to meet him. Suzy is realy nice, the next time I will have to invite my girlfriend too :)
So, thank you Howard and Suzy for this meeting, and see next time (in Portland ?)